Technology and Organizations

Posts Tagged ‘healthcare’

Practicing Systems Savvy for Decades: Providence Regional Medical Center Part 2

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

This is my second post focused on Providence Regional Medical Center of Everett, Washington and how I see their innovations as evidence of organization-wide systems savvy. That is, their efforts show that they understand both technical and organizational opportunities, and that they have the ability to weave them together into innovations — in this case, life saving innovations. I read about Providence in a BusinessWeek article and am thankful to Kim Williams, the Chief Nursing Officer of Providence and Judy Espedal, a Cardiac Critical Care staff nurse, and Dr. James Brevig, Director of Cardiac Surgery, for taking the time to tell me their story. Their examples are valuable because they give hope for healthcare innovation, they show us an exceptional process over a long span of years, and they help us see technology tools beyond computers and email. Here I will look at their approach as an overall practice of systems savvy, in Part 1, I provided a more detailed view of their “single stay” innovation.

Providence Medical Tower

Why am I certain that the Cardiac Surgery team has systems savvy? Because they haven’t made just one transformation — but several — each drawing on both technology and organizational practice to provide improvements in patient care. It is also important to understand that their innovations have been triggered by different forms of observation. In Part 1, it was the nursing staff’s observation of problems associated with how patients transferred to different units during the course of their care. In today’s examples: Blood conservation (less transfused blood is better in many cases) and skilled nursing education – the changes were triggered by statistical analysis suggesting room for improvement. Statistical techniques are themselves technology tools to apply in your organizational setting.

Blood conservation: In 2004 Dr. Brevig began the blood conservation program based on published research. He pushed for changes in surgical technique to reduce blood loss, changes in bypass machine settings to reduce the use of transfused blood, added a blood conservation coordinator to the staff, and worked with the critical care nurses on how to provide blood on outcomes, rather than routine. Follow-on analyses of patient outcomes verify the program’s success. From 2003 to 2007 the transfusion rate has decreased from 43 to 18% and the hospital stay time has been reduced by a half-day.

Skilled nursing education: In 2007 the cardiac surgery unit saw a bump to 12.2% of patients being readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. They used their analysis tools to dig into the issues and found that many of these patients were from skilled nursing facilities. Kim Williams says the team looked to what they could do to help these facilities take on patients after surgery. Providence developed an education program where a cardiac surgeon/critical care nurse team visit the skilled nursing facilities to help educate the staff on how to take care of cardiac surgery patients — teaching them about the common problems associated with readmissions — at no charge to the facility. In 2009 the readmission rate was down to 8.1%.

Once could be a fluke. Twice could be coincidence. Three times (single stay, blood conservation, skilled nursing education) is demonstrated skill with systems savvy. I would stand by this assessment even if there have been failures in the mix (though I’m not aware of any), given that their methods include long-term tracking and adjustments based on data.

This data appears to flow freely via collaboration, attention to communication, and long-term commitment. I asked Dr. Brevig about the distinguishing characteristics of the group – what, in his opinion, enables this team to be distinctively different in terms of their approach? He replied that the collaborative nature of the hospital pushes for buy-in and input across all members of the unit. My interpretation is that when true collaboration occurs in such a complex organization, technology and organization practice opportunities will both end up in the mix. We form teams to get diverse input, and sometimes, as in this case, it actually works.

Judy Espedal also emphasized the time and focus needed, noting that transformations take years and that you have to apply yourself from start to finish. Commitment is more likely given the Providence environment: With collaboration and communication, commitment is more likely.

From buy-in to showing that the innovation works, instituting the new practice, and on-going evaluation… these are conscious, explicit applications of systems savvy. No one functional area is making a decision. No one layer of the organization is making a decision. No one technology or practice stands above the rest. Providence takes a long-term perspective working with their full system of opportunities.

Summary of Providence’s systems savvy:

1. Ability to use different methods for identifying opportunities (not using just one lens).

2. Application of both technology tools and organizational practice to address the opportunity (the basics of systems savvy).

3. Long-term focus and tracked outcomes to suggest further adjustment (savvy, wisdom, is more than a short-term activity).

The doctors, nurses, and staff of Providence Regional Medical Center have a clear ability to see room for improvement and to find ways to do something about it. They draw on physical and analytic technology tools and make adjustments in their organizational practice given the variety of skills available, and they increase skills when needed. They do not try to fix a problem with a single “silver bullet.” The team uses an integrated approach where technology and practice support one another to reach specific goals.

I thank Providence for taking the time to share their story. This is health care reform.

Example One of TOP Management: Technology, Organization, People, and Intelligent Medicine

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

TOP (Technology, Organization, People) management requires systems savvy -- the ability to grasp the capabilities of a technology and how that technology might be meshed with organizational practice.  People with systems savvy understand that technologies and practices are intertwined — and they know how to make adjustments to both the technology and the practice to effectively weave them together.  In some of my earlier posts I’ve mentioned people I believe have systems savvy.  Here and in future posts I’ll be be presenting how how systems savvy (capability) can be used to practice TOP management (action).

Yesterday, the WSJ included Don Clark’s Take Two Digital Pills and Call Me in the Morning.  Andrew Thompson, CEO Proteus Biomedical Inc., and the other executives described in this article must practice TOP management to lead their ventures successfully.  For example, Proteus is testing a miniature digestible chip (the chip can be attached to conventional medication for less than a penny per pill) that communicates with a skin-worn sensing device that communicates via cell/internet with doctors.  The information includes confirmation that the medication is being used as well as vital signs.  Thompson (see the YouTube video below) says they are working in the field of “intelligent medicine.”  Intelligent in that information is tied to the therapy.

These intelligent systems tie together technology (the chips and their communication systems), organization (Doctors engaged in remotely monitoring patients, insurance companies involved in the reimbursement for the system), and people (taking human error out of the reporting process).  The effective use of these systems may have broad impact:  Clark writes, “Dozens of large and small companies are turning to wireless technology to achieve what the Obama administration is seeking through legislation: a health-care system that keeps people healthier for less.”  One of Clark’s sources describes “annual savings from remote monitoring at $10.1 billion for U.S. sufferers of congestive heart failure, $6.1 billion for diabetes and $4.9 billion for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.”

Andrew Thomson, William Chang, Randy Thurman, and Eric Topol (all mentioned in the article) practice TOP management in that they steer their ventures through a complex environment including:

  • Safety & privacy — Subject to Federal regulation
  • Costs & negotiations — Insurance reimbursement and doctors’ related willingness to perscribe
  • Technology understanding — For example, cell phones used to be banned in many hospital settings, now they are used as portable information devices for doctors

A leader in this setting cannot only be a lobbyist, liaison, or technologist.  They must be able to see how adjustments in any one area can be effectively intertwined with adjustments in the others.  Proteus even has a promo video making some of these points as they describe intelligent medicine as “technology + communication + healthcare.”  I found interesting the variety of ways they are thinking about communication: Monitoring device to patients, family, doctor… as well as technology to technology: (e.g., hip implant to running shoes).

TOP management is important in all organizations.  The executives in these intelligent medicine ventures can serve as exemplars given their extreme needs to manage technology, organization, and people together.  Particular examples of how they or others do this would be of great interest.